<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Online Rights Canada</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.onlinerights.ca,2008://2</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=2" title="Online Rights Canada" />
    <updated>2008-06-12T18:52:42Z</updated>
    <subtitle>A Citizens&apos; Group Dedicated to Promoting the Public Interest in Technology and Information Policy.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.2</generator>
 
<entry>
    <title>Prentice Plans to Rush Copyright Bill Through Parliament</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/the_day_before_the_copyright_b/" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=2/entry_id=29" title="Prentice Plans to Rush Copyright Bill Through Parliament" />
    <id>tag:www.onlinerights.ca,2008://2.29</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-03T05:07:40Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-12T18:52:42Z</updated>
    
    <summary>C-61, the all-new copyright bill has finally landed: and despite Industry Canada&apos;s spin, it contains all the worse provisions of the DMCA. Our companion site, Copyright For Canadians has letters to write and info you can use to warn your...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>DigitalRightsCanada.ca</name>
    </author>
            <category term="alert" />
            <category term="get_active" />
            <category term="news" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.onlinerights.ca/">
        <![CDATA[<p>C-61, the all-new copyright bill has finally landed: and despite Industry Canada's spin, it contains all the worse provisions of the DMCA. Our companion site, <a href="http://www.copyrightforcanadians.ca/">Copyright For Canadians</a> has <a href="http://www.copyrightforcanadians.ca/action/firstlook/">letters  to write</a> and info you can use to warn your MP that this is not a bill they should rubber-stamp.

<a href="http://www.copyrightforcanadians.ca/action/firstlook/"><img src="http://www.onlinerights.ca/images/button-send_letter.png" alt="send a letter" align="right" hspace="5"></a></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Track the new Copyright Bill with Copyright For Canadians</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/news/track_the_new_copyright_bill_w/" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=2/entry_id=28" title="Track the new Copyright Bill with Copyright For Canadians" />
    <id>tag:www.onlinerights.ca,2007://2.28</id>
    
    <published>2007-12-13T06:53:46Z</published>
    <updated>2008-01-12T18:08:23Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The revolt over the government&apos;s secretive and unsure approach to tabling new copyright reform has spread across the Canadian Net in a matter of days, and every hour seems to gain even more momentum. To help you keep track of...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>DigitalRightsCanada.ca</name>
    </author>
            <category term="Copyright" />
            <category term="news" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.onlinerights.ca/">
        <![CDATA[The revolt over the government's secretive and unsure approach to tabling new copyright reform has spread across the Canadian Net in a matter of days, and every hour seems to gain even more momentum. To help you keep track of all that's going on, Online Rights Canada has launched a separate mini-site, <a href="http://www.copyrightforcanadians.ca/">Copyright For Canadians</a>. We will, of course, be running our petitions, factfiles and action center activities here: but for a quick summary of news and reactions from across all of Canada's concerned groups and citizens, you might want to add Copyright For Canadians to your RSS newsreader or bookmark list.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Countdown to a New Copyright Bill</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/news/countdown_to_a_new_copyright_b_1/" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=2/entry_id=27" title="Countdown to a New Copyright Bill" />
    <id>tag:www.onlinerights.ca,2007://2.27</id>
    
    <published>2007-12-03T21:45:08Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-03T21:49:11Z</updated>
    
    <summary>There are strong indications that, sometime in the next two weeks, Industry Minister Jim Prentice will introduce the Conservative&apos;s version of a new copyright bill. The word is that it be terrible step backward for Canadian copyright reform. It will...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>DigitalRightsCanada.ca</name>
    </author>
            <category term="Copyright" />
            <category term="news" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.onlinerights.ca/">
        <![CDATA[There are strong indications that, sometime in the next two weeks, Industry
Minister Jim Prentice will introduce the Conservative's version of a new
copyright bill.  The word is that it be terrible step backward
for Canadian copyright reform. It will contain a wholesale importing of the United States' dismal
DMCA anti-circumvention regulations, with no new exceptions for parody or other "fair
use" limitations and exceptions, and no fix for private copying or the levy.  It's
as though United States and major rightsholder lobbyists wrote a laundry list
of wants, and the Conservatives were happy to hand it to them.  

We await the proposed language with concern, but in the meantime,  <a href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/get_active/copyright_reform_action/">write to your MP now</a>,
and urge them to take Canadian copyright into the 21st Century, not mimic the
last decade of intellectual property missteps from the United States.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Lawful Access Consultation Goes Public at Last</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/news/lawful_access_consultation_goes_public_at_last/" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=2/entry_id=26" title="Lawful Access Consultation Goes Public at Last" />
    <id>tag:www.onlinerights.ca,2007://2.26</id>
    
    <published>2007-09-14T01:35:25Z</published>
    <updated>2007-09-14T01:42:55Z</updated>
    
    <summary>As you may have read in the press or online, Public Safety Canada and Industry Canada recently launched a consultation on Lawful Access: how and when telecommunication companies (including ISPs) should hand over customer names and addresses to law enforcement....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>DigitalRightsCanada.ca</name>
    </author>
            <category term="Lawful Access" />
            <category term="news" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.onlinerights.ca/">
        <![CDATA[<p>As you may have read in <a href="http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=378b169e-036d-4ea8-9aba-8f10d7a570d6&k=77186">the press</a> or <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/2228/1/">online</a>, Public Safety Canada and Industry Canada recently launched a consultation on <a href="http://www.cippic.ca/en/projects-cases/lawful-access/">Lawful Access</a>: how and when telecommunication companies (including ISPs) should hand over customer names and addresses to law enforcement. </p>

<p>To call this a "public" consultation would be stretching it: the document was only passed around a limited number of stakeholders, and the government initially refused to allow it to be posted online. Its existence was not published in the Canada Gazette as is normally the case, and interested parties were only given until September 27 to make their comments.  Within it, the departments hint that law enforcement should have access to personal information without a court order or other judicial checks.  </p>

<p>The good news is that Public Safety Canada has now had an apparent change of heart - about the consultation, at least. The document has now been placed online, and the deadline for public comment extended by three weeks to October 12. </p>

<p>If you would like to make your voice heard, <a href="http://securitepublique.gc.ca/prg/ns/cna-en.asp">just follow the instructions provided by Public Safety</a>, and let them know exactly how you feel.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Blogger Posts Riding Data, Eases Access to MPs</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/news/blogger_posts_riding_data_ease/" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=2/entry_id=24" title="Blogger Posts Riding Data, Eases Access to MPs" />
    <id>tag:www.onlinerights.ca,2007://2.24</id>
    
    <published>2007-04-02T20:53:49Z</published>
    <updated>2007-04-11T13:33:59Z</updated>
    
    <summary>When we first looked into building a tool to help people write to their MPs, it seemed like a relatively straightforward task. And from a technical standpoint, it was. All you have to do is match a person&apos;s postal code...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>DigitalRightsCanada.ca</name>
    </author>
            <category term="news" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.onlinerights.ca/">
        <![CDATA[<p>When we first looked into building a tool to help people write to their MPs, it seemed like a relatively straightforward task.  And from a technical standpoint, it was. All you have to do is match a person's postal code to an electoral riding, then slap some code on the front to make it pretty.  But the data that links postal codes to electoral ridings is only available from Statistics Canada, and they charge thousands of dollars to those who want to use it.</p>

<p>We wondered why should people have to pay for uncopyrighted -- even *uncopyrightable* -- data about who belongs in which electoral riding.  That information has enormous value to the public, which could use tools built by non-governmental organizations to easily contact their MPs about important issues.</p>

<p>Apparently, Quebec blogger <a href="http:// danieljohn.livejournal.com/" target="_blank">danieljohn</a> felt the same way, and he has <a href="http://danieljohn.livejournal.com/109903.html" target="_blank">posted the whole database</a> online. We hope that Stats Canada will take his cue and post their own copy of the data for everyone to use.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Support Balanced Copyright Reform</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/news/support_balanced_copyright_ref/" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=2/entry_id=22" title="Support Balanced Copyright Reform" />
    <id>tag:www.onlinerights.ca,2006://2.22</id>
    
    <published>2006-05-03T22:59:53Z</published>
    <updated>2006-05-04T20:54:06Z</updated>
    
    <summary>During the last Parliament, Bill C-60 provided some sensible approaches to copyright reform in Canada, but it also left room for improvement. Rumours from Ottawa indicate that copyright reform is being discussed heavily at the moment, and that new legislation...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>DigitalRightsCanada.ca</name>
    </author>
            <category term="news" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.onlinerights.ca/">
        <![CDATA[<img src="http://www.onlinerights.ca/images/thumb_copyright_alert.png" align="left" id="thumb">During the last Parliament, Bill C-60 provided some sensible approaches to copyright reform in Canada, but it also left room for improvement. Rumours from Ottawa indicate that copyright reform is being discussed heavily at the moment, and that new legislation could be out within weeks.  It's vital that you tell your MP that any new legislation should be an improvement on Bill C-60, not the retreat being urged by big copyright holders.  Use our new mail-your-MP tool to <a href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/get_active/copyright_reform_action/">send a letter today</a>!<a href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/get_active/copyright_reform_action/"><img src="http://www.onlinerights.ca/images/button-send_letter.png" align="center" hspace="5" alt="send a letter"></a>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Can&apos;t afford the Copyright Cartel&apos;s big banquet?  Join Online Rights Canada for a Balanced Meal instead.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/news/balanced_meal/" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=2/entry_id=21" title="Can't afford the Copyright Cartel's big banquet?  Join Online Rights Canada for a &lt;font color=&quot;#CC0000&quot;&gt;Balanced Meal&lt;/font&gt; instead." />
    <id>tag:www.onlinerights.ca,2006://2.21</id>
    
    <published>2006-01-17T22:15:37Z</published>
    <updated>2006-01-17T23:12:36Z</updated>
    
    <summary> On January 19th, the Copyright Lobby is putting on a fancy banquet to generate political donations for a friendly MP. They might be doing it because they&apos;re nice, or perhaps they&apos;re feeling generous because of the influence they expect...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>DigitalRightsCanada.ca</name>
    </author>
            <category term="news" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.onlinerights.ca/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
On January 19th, the Copyright Lobby is putting on a <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/story/canadavotes2006/national/2006/01/06/elxn-bulte-fundraiser.html" target="_self">fancy banquet</a> to generate political donations for a friendly MP.  They might be doing it because they're nice, or perhaps they're feeling generous because of the influence they expect to gain once the night is over.  But no matter what their motivations, the event presents a startling picture: copyright interests contributing thousands of dollars to a politician who sets policy for their industry.
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>
This link can't be ignored, especially in a year when Canadian copyright is likely to undergo its <a href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/learn/copyright/" target="_self">biggest revision in decades</a>.  If politicians take tens of thousands of dollars from the industries they regulate, are independent artists, educators, librarians and the general public really going to get a fair shake?  So come out on Thursday, have a bite to eat, and find out how regular Canadians can get a seat at the copyright reform table.
</p>

<h3>Important Things:</h3>
<ol>
	<li>This is a nonpartisan event, and we don't have any position on how you should vote in the coming election.  Partisan raconteurs need not apply.</li>

	<li>ORC can't pay for dinner.  Sorry, but we're a not-for-profit organization!</li>

	<li>Please RSVP to <a href="mailto:info@OnlineRights.ca">info [at] OnlineRights.ca</a>.  Seating will be limited, but we love a crowd.</li>
</ol>


<h3>Logistics:</h3>
<p>
<b>When:</b>
<ul>
	<li>Thursday, January 19th 2006</li>
	<li>6 P.M. - 7 P.M.</li>
</ul>
</p>

<p>
<b>Where:</b>
<ul>
	<li><a href="http://www.thedrakehotel.ca/inthehouse.asp#cafe" target="_self">The Corner Cafe</a> @ The Drake Hotel (<a href="http://www.thedrakehotel.ca/menus/0510_cafe.pdf">PDF Menu</a>)</li>
	<li>1150 Queen St. W. in Toronto (<a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?oi=map&amp;q=1150+Queen+St+West+Toronto,+Ontario,+CA" target="_self">Map</a>)</li>
</ul>
</p>

<p>
<b>More Info:</b>
<ul>
	<li><a href="http://www.OnlineRights.ca/news/balanced_meal">http://www.OnlineRights.ca/news/balanced_meal</a><br /></li>
	<li>Call Ren @ 416/300-5316 on the night of the event if you get lost</li>
</ul>
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Keep Big Content&apos;s Money Out of Canadian Copyright Policy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/news/keep_big_contents_money_out_of/" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=2/entry_id=19" title="Keep Big Content's Money Out of Canadian Copyright Policy" />
    <id>tag:www.onlinerights.ca,2006://2.19</id>
    
    <published>2006-01-11T18:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2006-01-11T19:31:24Z</updated>
    
    <summary>With the fall of the 38th Parliament, Bill C-60, An Act to Amend the Copyright Act, died on the order table. However, the election has not sidelined the copyright debate – far from it. Copyright policy – and its unfortunate...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>DigitalRightsCanada.ca</name>
    </author>
            <category term="news" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.onlinerights.ca/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.onlinerights.ca/images/thumb_copyright_pledge.png" align="left" id="thumb">With the fall of the 38th Parliament, <a href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/learn/what_is_c-60/">Bill C-60, An Act to Amend the Copyright Act</a>, died on the order table.  However, the election has not sidelined the copyright debate – far from it.  Copyright policy – and its unfortunate ties to campaign financing – has become a hot election issue.  OnlineRights.ca has <a href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/get_active/copyright_pledge_petition/" target="_self">launched a  petition</a> calling on politicians to swear off Big Content's lobbying money, and we've also posted <a href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/learn/copyright/money_in_politics_conflicts_fo/">some background on the story and some offline ways for you to get involved</a>.  <a href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/get_active/copyright_pledge_petition/"><img src="http://www.onlinerights.ca/images/button-go_to_pet.png" align="center" hspace="5" alt="go to petition"></a>
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Online Rights Canada Launches with EFF, CIPPIC Support</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/news/online_rights_canada_launches/" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=2/entry_id=17" title="Online Rights Canada Launches with EFF, CIPPIC Support" />
    <id>tag:www.onlinerights.ca,2005://2.17</id>
    
    <published>2005-12-09T05:26:55Z</published>
    <updated>2005-12-09T14:31:15Z</updated>
    
    <summary> Online Rights Canada (ORC) launched in Canada Friday, giving Canadians a new voice in critical technology and information policy issues. The grassroots organization is jointly supported by the Canadian Internet Policy &amp; Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC) and the Electronic...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>DigitalRightsCanada.ca</name>
    </author>
            <category term="news" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.onlinerights.ca/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
Online Rights Canada (ORC) launched in Canada Friday, giving Canadians a new voice in critical technology and information policy issues.  The grassroots organization is jointly supported by the Canadian Internet Policy & Public Interest Clinic (<a href="http://www.cippic.ca/" target="_blank">CIPPIC</a>) and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (<a href="http://www.eff.org/" target="_blank">EFF</a>).
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>
"Canadians are realizing in ever-greater numbers that the online world offers tremendous opportunities for learning, communicating, and innovating, but that those opportunities are at risk as a result of corporate practices, government policies and legal regimes that hinder online privacy and free speech," said Philippa Lawson, Executive Director and General Counsel of CIPPIC.  "Online Rights Canada provides a home on the Internet for grassroots activism on digital issues that are important to ordinary Canadians."
</p>

<p>
"With the Canadian government preparing for a January election, all of last year's legislation is back on the drawing board.  Canadians now have another chance to present a public interest perspective on issues like copyright reform and increased government surveillance,” said Ren Bucholz, EFF's Policy Coordinator, Americas.  “We are happy to be launching ORC at such a critical time."
</p>

<p>
One of ORC's first actions is a petition drive against unwarranted surveillance law.  A bill proposed in Parliament last month would have allowed law enforcement agencies to obtain personal information without a warrant and forced communications providers to build surveillance backdoors into the hardware that routes phone calls and Internet traffic.  The petition asks Canadian lawmakers to protect citizens' privacy rights when the new government convenes in 2006.  Other important issues for ORC will include copyright law, access to information, and freedom from censorship.
</p>

<p>
"Today, ORC focuses on digital copyright and lawful access.  But there is no reason to restrict the site to those two issues," said CIPPIC Staff Counsel David Fewer.  "Our hope is that ORC will evolve into the first place to go for Canadians looking for opportunities to protect their online rights.  Anyone can be an activist - Online Rights Canada will give you the tools you need."
</p>

<p>
Online Rights Canada is the latest group to join the global fight for digital rights.  <a href="http://www.digitalrights.ie/" target="_blank">Digital Rights Ireland</a> launched earlier this week, and the <a href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/" target="_blank">Open Rights Group</a> launched in the United Kingdom last month. 
</p>

<p>Contact:</p>

<p>
<b>Ren Bucholz</b>
<blockquote style="margin: -1em 0 0 1em;">
   Policy Coordinator, Americas<br />
   Electronic Frontier Foundation<br />
   ren@eff.org<br />
   +1 416 628-0777
</blockquote>
</p>

<p>
<b>Philippa Lawson</b>
<blockquote style="margin: -1em 0 0 1em;">
   Executive Director<br />
   Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic<br />
   plawson@uottawa.ca<br />
   +1 613 562-5800 X 2556
</blockquote>
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>ORC Opposes Unwarranted Surveillance</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/news/orc_opposes_unwarranted_survei/" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=2/entry_id=13" title="ORC Opposes Unwarranted Surveillance" />
    <id>tag:www.digirights.ca,2005:/staging//2.13</id>
    
    <published>2005-12-08T04:30:51Z</published>
    <updated>2005-12-08T19:43:12Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Bill C-74, the Modernization of Investigative Techniques Act, would have allowed law enforcement agencies to obtain identifying information about you without a warrant. Even worse, it would have forced communications providers to build surveillance back-doors into the hardware that routes...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>DigitalRightsCanada.ca</name>
    </author>
            <category term="news" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.onlinerights.ca/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.onlinerights.ca/images/thumb_la.png" align="left" id="thumb">Bill C-74, the <a href="http://www.parl.gc.ca/PDF/38/1/parlbus/chambus/house/bills/government/C-74_1.PDF" target="_blank">Modernization of Investigative Techniques Act</a>, would have allowed law enforcement agencies to obtain identifying information about you without a warrant. Even worse, it would have forced communications providers to build surveillance back-doors into the hardware that routes our phone calls, Internet traffic, and more. Tell the new Parliament not to erode your privacy - sign our petition today!<a href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/get_active/lawful_access_petition/"><img src="http://www.onlinerights.ca/images/button-go_to_pet.png" align="center" hspace="5" alt="go to petition"></a>
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>New Year&apos;s Resolution: Learn About Copyright Reform</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/news/new_years_resolution/" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.onlinerights.ca/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=2/entry_id=16" title="New Year's Resolution: Learn About Copyright Reform" />
    <id>tag:www.onlinerights.ca,2005://2.16</id>
    
    <published>2005-12-08T04:03:02Z</published>
    <updated>2005-12-08T04:08:29Z</updated>
    
    <summary>With the Canadian government on early holiday, last year&apos;s copyright reform legislation is officially dead. But it&apos;s going to be back in 2006, and all of its provisions will be up for debate. ORC has assembled a set of easy-to-use...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>DigitalRightsCanada.ca</name>
    </author>
            <category term="news" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.onlinerights.ca/">
        <![CDATA[<p>With the Canadian government on early holiday, last year's copyright reform legislation is officially dead.  But it's going to be back in 2006, and all of its provisions will be up for debate.  ORC has assembled a set of easy-to-use background materials on copyright reform that will get you up to speed.  <a href="/learn/copyright/">Click here for the full archive</a>.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

